| Call For David Lillehaug! |
|
|
|
| Written by Mitch |
| Tuesday, 11 December 2007 11:02 |
|
Ms. Assam would seem to be a hero…:
…but I’m just waiting to see how the Sorosphere and John Stewart titter over this bit…:
Any bets? Me? No action on that bet. Too sure a thing. The only real question is “how scatological and insulting will they get?” UPDATE: Greetings, CQ Readers. Ed was right - we talked about “Gun free zones” over the weekend on the NARN show, before the Colorado attacks. Ed notes:
And I want to make sure that answer gets to David Lillehaug, former US Attorney for Minnesota, occasional DFL Senate candidate, and lawyer who - on behalf of a well-heeled left-leaning congregation in Edina, tried to get churches declared a de facto gun free zone without needing to bother to post any notices, and to exempt church parking lots from the state regulation that carry permittees are allowed to keep their guns in the trunks of their cars. He was behind the court case that led to the Minnesota Personal Protection Act’s temporary blockage at the hands of a DFL-pet judge for about nine months starting in June 2004. Lillehaug leads the group that is, for me, the most insufferable pack of anti-gun zealots - the ones that wrap themselves in a suffocating mantle of misplaced piety, ignoring the words of St. Thomas Aquinas: “In order for (violence) to be justified, three things are necessary: First, the authority of the soverign [an archaic reference to Americans - we are all soveriegn, and at any rate the permit is a sign the government, acting on behalf of all of us sovereigns, thinks you’re capable of defending yourself]. Secondly, a just cause. Thirdly, a rightful intention”. Does protecting the innocent - especially our children - from mass murderers fit these criteria? If you say “no”, be prepared to withstand a rhetorical wolverine ripping at your logical butt. Cross-posted at Shot in the Dark. Comments welcome. |




