We’ve been pointing out for years – correctly – that “Protect” Minnesota has never, not once, made a single statement that is simultaneously original, substantial and true.
But today, the’ve slid over the line into slander.
“We hope that groups like Minnesota Gun Rights, Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus and Gun Owners Civil Rights Alliance can provide good information to the FBI to find and arrest the people responsible” for the Dar Al Farook firebombing?
Even by Nancy Nord Bence’s, er, casual standards of honesty and integrity, this is – pardon the middle-English – chickenshit.
And in a jiust world, it’d be actionable. Let’s review from a couple years ago; Defmation – Libel and Slander – are when Party A says something about Party B that:
- Is untrue
- Can damage Party B’s livelihood and reputation in the community
- If Party B is a public figure (and the three groups that Nord Bence slandered certainly are), it can be shown that Party A acted with a malicious disregard for fact.
“P”M’s claim that any Minnesota 2nd Amendment group knows who bombed Dar Al Farook is certainly untrue. Accusations of abetting terrorism are certainly damaging to a community non-profit group. And given Nancy Nord Bence and her associates’ long record of scabrous attacks on GOCRA and MNGOC, malice isn’t a huge stretch.
If the gun groups want to sue, I’ll set up a kickstarter to raise funds.
PS to lawyers in the audience: Yep. I know. Negligence is a defense against the “Malicious Intent” element. It says something that “P”M’s big defense in this case is “We’re too stupid and morally bankrupt to know any better”. God bless America.