| Steve Perry: Rules For Ye, But Not For We |
|
|
|
| Written by Mitch |
| Friday, 28 March 2008 22:13 |
|
He and his minions - in this case, Karl Bremer - tried to play the “public activism” game earlier this week (or, to be accurate, continued his decade-long obession with sliming his bete noire, Rep. Michele Bachmann). And as we all know, one of the wages of public activism is that the public gets their cut at you. And Perry is trying to cut back. But now that he’s dealing with people who play the game better than he does, it’s just…not…working:
Well, there’s a gutless little slur for ya, right outta the gate! “Pro-war?” Guess Perry hasn’t read David Bellavia’s book, or heard the guy speak. Simple fact; there’s nobody on earth more anti-war, as a concept and as a fact, than someone who’s spent time in combat. Bellavia is no GOP stooge; his book is pretty forthright about his own beliefs, as well as those of us fellow grunts (he talks with admiration about one of his squad’s fire-team leaders, a Polish-American who hated Bush and Rumsfeld with a passion that might yet land him a Soros stipend of his own). Pro-war? Tell it to Bellavia’s face.
And True North removed that information almost immediately. (And yeah, I condemn anyone who threatened Karl Bremer, assuming it happened - which is a hell of a lot more than Bremer would do for me or anyone who’d ever spoken out against him, I guarantee you. I believe that people should be able to separate their activism and their private life; I’ve respected people on that count pretty religiously; Karl Bremer’s associates have not).
Yep. So - so what? We continue the transcription:
And again - so what? Mr. Perry: Is Jason wrong? Is Karl Bremer - a very frequent source and sometime contributor to Perry’s propaganda mill, as well as a high-profile contrib to Perry’s ex-gig, the Daily Mole - not a public figure? Is his public involvement in the stifling of Vets for Freedom’s appearance somehow off-limits? Why? (Preferably in terms other than “because we really really want it to be”? I mean, Bremer likes to dish out the abuse. Not that I advocate abuse (to say nothing of Bremer’s brand of context-mangling hackery), but can’t he take it? If so, then why is he mixing it up in public? And why is Steve Perry breathlessly repeating his “reporting” as fact?
Well, I can’t speak for Steve Versnick. If I were Jason Lewis’ boss (and Clear Channel could do, and has done, worse), though, my response might be something like…:
Which is a lot nicer than my first draft, “If you find something here that isn’t strictly covered by the First Amendment, then go pound sand up your ass, crybaby”. Here’s hoping. Cross-posted at Shot in the Dark. Comments welcome. |



Steve “Mister Furious” Perry - former journalist, now Soros minion and “editor” of the Minnesota Monitor, is sad.



