| What's the Big Deal? |
|
|
|
| Written by Gary Gross |
| Monday, 08 September 2008 02:31 |
|
The NY Times is reporting that MSDNC has picked David Gregory to "anchor news coverage of the coming debates and election night." Big deal:
Instead of there being two hotheaded egotistical liberals on stage, they'll now have three. I don't think that's the definition of reform to most people. I guess that's MSDNC's definition. Perhaps that's why they're in the situation they're in. The funniest quote from the article comes from MSDNC's President Phil Griffin:
MSDNC consistently comes in last in the ratings. What sane person would characterize that as "experiencing incredible success"? That's spin that a Clintonista would admire. I'm certain that consistently finishing last wouldn't be characterized as "experiencing incredible success" elsewhere in the business community. I'm betting that the executives at NBC News consider it success, either.
MSDNC can insist all it wants. The proof tells a different story. I'm finicky that way: I'll trust proof over everything else because talk is cheap. It's easy to figure out what's happened if you pay attention to what just happened. This isn't a big deal. Thinking that David Gregory, one of the most partisan White House correspondents around, will control Chris Matthews, much less Keith Olbermann, is foolish. If MSDNC wants to be taken seriously, they should get serious commentators/analysts. Until then, they'll be treated with disdain. They'll deserve being viewed as the laughingstock of the news industry. Comments welcome at LFR. |




