| Much Ado |
|
|
|
| Written by Mitch |
| Monday, 12 May 2008 11:27 |
|
Simple truism of the American mainstream media; the faintest move to the left will be portrayed as a major tectonic change in American politics (while any drift to the right will be regarded as an anomaly or pathology). One classic example; when Ed Schultz “went national” four years ago, he had six stations; Minneapolis, Fargo, and a bunch of small rural towns. Joe Soucheray had a bigger network at that time. And yet Schultz got a raving full-bore-hype showcase on the Today show, complete with Katie Couric cooing “is he the left’s answer to Rush Limbaugh?”. Six stations. Of course, that’s as nothing compared to the cacaphony any time any “traditionally Republican” group sheds any demographic dandruff. Which brings us to this headline: “Evangelicals Flee the GOP“. That’d be pretty serious news, if were true…:
Er, I’m sure it’s not - inasmuch as the GOP does, always has, and always will poll weakest among “the young”; Churchill’s dictum (”a man who’s not a liberal at 20 has no heart; a man who’s not a conservative at 40 has no brain”) is as true now as ever. Whether being “an evange What is the nature of this catastrophic exodus? (I add emphasis):
“Traditionally a shoo-in?” Since when? If 15 percent of that group “don’t identify with the GOP” now? Fine - what was that number in 2004? 2000? 1996? We don’t know - because, I suspect, the answer would show what a non-story this is. Or would, if it needed to - since, like most of those “[name your group] are deserting the GOP’ stories, further reading shows there’s really no there there.
So in other words, out out of six evangelicals in an age group that society-wide traditionally doesn’t vote GOP, claim to be falling out with the party - and of them, only one in three is actually jumping to the Tics? The real news would seem to be “Among Young Evanglicals, the GOP has a 17-1 (85%05%) Majority”. I mean, wouldn’t it? Cross-posted and comments welcome at Shot In The Dark. |








