Full House PDF Print E-mail
Written by Mitch   
Thursday, 08 May 2008 12:09

So about 600 or so of my closest friends joined us at the Northland Inn in Brooklyn Park last night for the first ever  debate, anywhere in the world, between nationally-syndicated conservative and liberal talk show hosts.  Michael Medved took on Ed Schultz in the two-hour “Donnybrook in Brooklyn Park”.  The event was jointly sponsored - this may be a national first - by AM950 Air America Minnesota and AM1280 The Patriot.

I co-MCed the event with former Minnesota state representative Matt Entenza.  We did a point-counterpoint format, switching off between me questioning Schultz and Entenza querying Medved.  Each response got two minutes; the other party got a minute’s rebuttal; if needed the original respondant got a minute worth of redirect.

Well, officially, anyway.  There were a few times it was hard to control the flow of things - but we did our best.

A few random observations, in no particular order:

  • Advance ticket sales as of the day before the event were roughly 4-1 in favor of AM1280 fans.  The lefties hit the doors late, however, so I estimate the crowd ended up about 2.5 or 3 to 1 conservative. 
  • The lefties, however, made up for the numerical disadvantage with…er, enthusiasm.  Not that that was a bad thing; it was a fun evening.
  • While I’ll admit my bias, I think it’s fair to say that Medved won on knowledge of facts and their coherent, articulate presentation. 
  • What Schultz lacked in knowledge and ability to answer a question, however, he more than made up for with sheer volume.  He attacked the podium for every question, no matter how innocuous, at top volume, barely needing a microphone most of the night.  Face red, veins bulging, fingers poking the air in front of him for emphasis, he looked a bit like a banana-republic dictator on the dais.  But in a good way.
  • Schultz had a very politician-like tendency to dodge the questions that were asked, and swerved handily into Carville/Begala-caliber snarking points as a substitute for actual command of the issues.
  • The audience was…let’s just say “animated”.  In the interest of fairness, the heckling was bipartisan (although there were a group of people down to stage-left that were, I’ll be polite, bellowing like baying dogs at Medved). 
  • The first half of the debate involved questions from Entenza and I.  For the second half, we took questions from the audience, on written index cards.  We found a lot of good ones - Entenza and I probably had 100 questions to sort through.  But there were some others and…well, let’s just say that I gotta shout out to America’s talk show phone screeners on the left and the right.  Whoooie.  It’s a tough job.

Leftyblogger Gavin Sullivan was there with a camera and his own review.

If you were there, feel free to drop a comment. 

Cross-posted at Shot In The Dark.