| Discomfort At The University Of St. Thomas |
|
|
|
| Written by Scott Johnson |
| Monday, 14 April 2008 08:08 |
|
The University of St. Thomas is the major private university in the Twin Cities, with campuses in both Minneapolis and St. Paul. It is a Catholic institution, but it also worships strange gods at the shrine of political correctness. In "Petty tyranny at the University of St. Thomas" I recounted the school's bizarre disapproval of Star Parker from speaking at the school on the harmful impact of abortion. The rationale? Parker's speech was to be funded in part by the Young America's Foundation, which had also funded Ann Coulter's appearance at the school in 2005. St. Thomas has given new life to the principle of guilt by association. How did Ann Coulter give offense during her appearance at St. Thomas? I tried to get an answer to that question when Father Dennis Dease condemned Coulter's talk as "hateful speech." Father Dease hadn't attended the event and wouldn't take my call, but school spokesman Doug Hennes did. Hennes had clearly authored Father Dease's statement condemning Coulter's talk.
Hennes referred at the time I spoke with him to "the way she treated people," ridiculing students who asked her critical questions, and certain elements of her speech that "crossed the line" and were "real controversial." He said that Coulter had advocated the invasion of "every Muslim country," for example, although he had not taken notes on the speech or listened to any recording of it. No report on the speech included a quote advocating invasion of every Muslim country. Although Coulter might have been asked about her post-9/11 column on the subject, I don't think her speech included the statement Hennes cited to me. Hennes appears today in Katherine Kersten's Star Tribune column on the St. Thomas's refusal to approve Star Parker's appearance at the school on April 21. Vice President Jane Canney, who objected to the involvement of the Young America's Foundation -- would not return Kersten's call. Hennes had plenty of time to articulate a rationale, and this was the best he could do:
Even conceding the incredible stupidity of this rationale, I find it striking that after three years Hennes still cannot cite a particular Coulter statement of Coulter that crossed any line drawn by St. Thomas. The following day Hennes reiterated his statement, then sought to "clarify" it:
Hennes and Canney are tyrants of the petty bureaucratic variety, but they seem to have inspired a rebellion at St. Thomas:
Let's just hope Father Dease and his apparatchiks don't call in the tanks. |




